Which recipe style do you like better?
RECIPE STYLE 1: Conventional The style most magazines and cookbooks go with where all ingredients written in a list before the instructions. Like this delicious looking tagliatelle I will be making soon.
OR
RECIPE STYLE 2: Casual Ingredients are integrated with instruction usingย casual estimates for measurements (โa handful of walnutsโ or โa few glugs of olive oilโ or โa big heaping spoonful of Dijonโ). Like this recipe forย easy shrimp tacos (and like 95% of recipes that appear on DALS.)
Iโm torn. The dinner diarist in me gets comfort from seeing a clear list and exact plan and everything in order. But sometimes, I feel like it can have the opposite effect. A long list of ingredients can scare me off. And I worry that being so exact about measurements makes readers less likely to improvise, i.e. less likely to learn and experiment and, ultimately, feel confident. Thatโs why I usually write in Recipe Style 2. But I could see that this might alienate people would rather be told exactly what to do and how to do it.
Anyway, I would love to hear your thoughts โ beginning cooks are especially welcome โ even if itโs just a quick comment below voting for โCasualโ or โConventional.โ ย Thanks!
I like a combo. Conventional listing of ingredients merged w/ casual instructions.
Do let us know the final preference tally please.
While I appreciate conventional, casual is great because it feels more flexible. As a college student, budgets and ingredients are always limited, so casual styles make swapping something out more doable and less of a travesty of the original recipe.
That being said, as a beginning cook, I can deal with glugs and pinches, but technical advice must be sound, ie how to tell when something is done, or Iโm going to end up poisoning myself. ๐
Combo please! I really do like the casual style but when it comes to not just reading a recipe but making a recipe I want a list of ingredients at the start so that I know what I need.
I like conventional recipesโitโs hard for me to see within the recipe what Iโll need and I like it all spelled out in the beginning. And Iโve been cooking for a long time!
My biggest pet peeve is when a recipe will list an ingredient once, but doesnโt note it is divided. I always dump the whole amount in and donโt realize until I need the rest! So, in that case, I guess I prefer the integrated method.
I like the idea of marrying the two approaches tooโฆ I like the list of ingredients laid out up front to increase the likelihood that I have what I need before I start but then I love pinches/glugs/substitutions!
ok. if itโs a new recipe that iโve never tried before i like #1โฆ.because i can take everything out or make a shopping listโฆit just feels more organized and not as intimidating. Also, i find that if itโs a recipe that iโm making with my kids #1 is the top choiceโฆorganized and manageable. BUT i love the feel of the casual #2 styleโฆfor recipes that iโve been making a long time and i just need a reminder. Also, if itโs a family/friend recipe it should be casual with lots of stains.
Definitely conventional since I have the tendency to start a recipe and overlook the fact that Iโm missing a major ingredient. I never follow recipes exactly, but it helps me to see the ingredients up front before I start making my own changes.
I vote for conventional, but what I really love about DALS (and most of my favorite cookbook authors) is the inclusion of a headnote, with a little anecdote about the recipe, followed by the conventional layout. It gives things the chatty feeling inherent in the casual approach, yet provides a clear list of easily scanned ingredients. Thatโs a good place, too, of course, to note any possible substitutions.
Like many others have already suggested, I best like a hybrid: casual recipe supplemented with a list of ingredients.
Has to be conventional โ that way when Iโm in a rush I can easily see what needs to be bought and can cut and paste into a list.
Casual because thatโs what a recipe essentially boils down to anyways. When I print out a recipe with a long list of ingredients, it always makes me cringe for wasting paper and or ink.
Conventional 100%. I have been burned too many times before by skimming non-conventionally written recipes and thinking I have everything (and enough time) and getting halfway through and realizing I donโt have enough of either. If itโs not written conventionally, Iโm likely to skip it.
That said Iโm comfortable with quantities with quantities such as a glug of this or a handful of that. But I need to see all the ingredients up front.
I like conventional when making out a grocery list, but while cooking-Iโm fine with casual.
I like when the instructions portion of a recipe is has a nice flow to it; like weโre talking about what to do. However, I do like the list of ingredients at the top so I can gather everything ahead of time. I find that when I use a recipe that has ingredients integrated into the instructions, Iโll miss something and not have enough time to dice four onions before they need to go in NOW! Ha. Maybe thatโs just me and my twitchiness in the kitchen, though.
Hope that helps. And by the wayโฆ porcupine meatballs was a classic my grandma made growing up!
Cheers,
*Heather*
Conventional. (Iโm a beginning cook.) I donโt mind it when, say, a writer says โtoss a handfulโ or โsaute in olive oilโ but doesnโt say X Tbsp oil, but I do like the list and I like it clear. Would you say your TIME FOR DINNER was casual or conventional? I found that very easy and helpful as a cook (plus the photos in that were really nice).
Years ago I could only handle conventional recipies โ then my mother-in-law (who is Vietnamese) taught me some of my husbandโs favorite recipies. She does not own one single measuring spoon or cup. Those recipies were shared and recorded in the casual style and I feel such a deeper connection to her when I see them written down. I also think that those recipies are the reason we have such a great relationship!
Conventional! I like to know at a glance what ingredients I need to have for a recipe.
Conventional, just for the ease of assessing if I have enough of everything.
Conventional, definitely, so I can quickly check ingredients before beginning and scan throughout to make sure I havenโt forgotten something, which I frequently have!
I think a hybrid of the two might work well. A list of ingredients up at the top (no details on quantity, just so you can quickly scan and make sure you have what you need), and then a conversational tone walking you through the details. Just like my mother did it !
I REALLY dislike having to read the whole recipe to find out what is in it-the ingredients play the biggest part in deciding whether or not Iโm going to cook the recipe, not the instructions.
As far as the instructions themselves, casual is great for me because I am an experienced cook, but I know when I was learning additional detail was appreciated.
Style #1 makes it easier to get your brain around your grocery list.
Like the idea of a hybrid with a narrative but need ,sat list or Iโll definitely miss something!
Like the idea of a hybrid with a narrative but need that list or Iโll definitely miss something!